Archive for September, 2011

By: Will Power

One of the biggest fallacies made by many who are new to fitness, and some who aren’t, is stressing the idea that muscle weighs more that fat.  I’ve heard this term used so frequently amongst even my clients that I felt it my duty to dispel this gross misconception for everyone.  So, cutting straight to the chase, a pound of fat weighs exactly the same as a pound of muscle.  A pound is a pound no matter how you present it, cut it, separate it or compound it.  A pound of steel weighs exactly the same as a pound of feathers.  But if that’s the case then where did this misconception come from in the first place?  Well I would have to imagine its based around the fact that muscle is considerably more dense than fat, meaning volumetrically it would take more fat to make up that pound than it would if that pound were made up of muscle.  For those of you who did homework for other classes all through basic chemistry, ill explain.  Since muscle is denser, it weighs more per unit of space.  Picture it like a 2” steel ball that weighs 1 pound on a balance beam and on the other side you have to place 5 packs of loose leaf paper in order to equal out that pound on the beam.  Obviously the packet takes up way more space than the 2” steel ball but being that the ball is denser (i.e. weighs more per unit of space) the smaller ball is equal to the 5 packs in weight.  That being said, if you take a 5” x 5” x 5” cube of muscle and one of fat, the muscle will weigh more simply because of its higher density and compactness.  This is the primary reason many people can look up to 30lbs less than they actually are simply because of their muscle to fat ratio.

Now, why is this important you ask? Well, the fact of the matter is as you resistance train, it is inevitable that you will gain a few pounds, sometimes even when on a weight loss program.  A little bit of muscle goes a long way trust me. However, the difference between weight gained trough resistance training and weight gained from canoodling that thanksgiving turkey is that you are gaining lean muscle mass.  You will look and feel slimmer but that scale won’t be consoling.  This is frankly why I tell people for the most part “F” the scale (for lack of a better term).  The scale may tell you how much you weigh but it doesn’t tell you how much of it is fat and how much is muscle.  The best judge of progress is how your clothes fit, how you look in the mirror at home and better yet how you feel overall.

In sum, muscle does not weigh more than fat, it is simply denser.  However, muscle is way more metabolically active so it allows you to burn more calories with less effort.  The more muscle you have, the more calories you burn.  So when it comes down to a discussion of muscle vs. fat the only thing you need to know is that you want to build muscle and shrink fat.

The Truth Behind Spot Reduction

Posted: September 5, 2011 by williampower in Exercise, Myth Busting

By: Will Power

          A lot of people walk around making love to the idea that if they want to trim a certain area of their body then spot reduction is the way to go.  But what is spot reduction and does this technique actually work?  Spot reduction is the idea that exercises consistently done for a certain area of the body will reduce or eliminate fat in that area.  As for whether it works, well…and I apologize for being anti-climactic so early on but, yes and no.

Studies published in the American Journal of Physiology have indeed shown evidence that when exercise is localized to a certain region of the body, blood flow to adipose tissue (fat) in that area is increased significantly.  This increased blood flow triggers higher levels of “lipolysis” (break down and releasing of fat into the bloodstream to be used as fuel) in the targeted area suggesting that you do burn body fat in the specific area being trained.

The problem with this course of action when it comes to body fat reduction, and the reason spot reduction is constantly discredited, is that any fat loss through the spot reduction techniques, if any, is often insignificant in relation to the body as a whole.  Overall body fat must be reduced to lose significant fat in any particular area.  Fat deposition and reduction patterns are determined by genetics (see “Where Did My Fat Go?!”), hormonal distinction (sex) and age (lifecycle).  Now it is true that despite the fact that fat is both gained and reduced throughout the entire body, a multitude of people tend to accumulate significant fat in their midsections (men and some women (usually post menopausal)) and hips and thighs (women and some men).

However, let it be known that you can do all the sit ups you want, the crunches, the leg raises, the torso rotations; you can try all those gimmicky products you see advertised on those infomercials made to take advantage of gullible consumers if you like.  If you do, I promise you will have the nicest abs, legs and thighs you can imagine, right under all your layers of fat.  At the end of the day, and I can’t reiterate this enough, if you want to reduce fat, exercise and proper dieting are your best keys to victory.

Where did my fat go?!

Posted: September 2, 2011 by williampower in Genetics
Tags: , , , ,

One of the biggest differences between men and women is how much fat is retained in the body and where it’s deposited. The typical male will, on average, hold about 10 to 15% body fat while women will house 18 to 25% body fat. The biggest reason for the fat discrepancy between genders is the fact that at some point in time women may have to nourish a fetus with only her bodily reserves. Therefore, women are biologically wired to stock extra energy in the form of fat in preparation of possible future pregnancies.

History has shown that climatic conditions over time do impact where fat is deposited in the female body. For those whose ancestry is traced through hotter or less temperate climates (African Americans, Mediterraneans, and some Asians), fat is typically localized in the butt, hips and around the navel. Darwinistically speaking, this avoids blanketing said females’ entire bodies with a hot coat of fat that is inefficient for thermoregulation during high temps. In colder countries fat is more evenly distributed throughout the body for protection from extremely cold weather. The climates your family was exposed to throughout your lineage plays a big factor in where your fat is localized presently. Just to be clear, men are affected the same way and fat is localized by the same principles as it is in women; the major difference is, due to the reasons stated above, women tend to accumulate their excess in certain areas. For the most part these areas avoid places that can interfere with movement.

These areas include:

  • Butt – besides energy reserve, fat is stored here to help cushion contact between the tail bone and external surfaces (chair, ground, etc).

*At some point in every woman’s life fat begins to leave the gluteal fold (butt) and it can begin to sag. Only appropriate training of the gluteals will compensate for this disappearance of fat and loss of tone*

  • Lower Back
  • Posterior Hip Area Above The Butt
  • Between The Thighs
  • Around the Navel
  • Pubis
  • Knee
  • Upper Back Of Arm
  • Breasts (encloses mammary glands)
  • *note that these fat deposits are more pronounced in some women than others based on genetics and body type (see What’s My Body Type…Or Should I Say Somatotype)*